Hoi,
The language committee is not tasked with indicating the projects that are
dormant.
If anything it is our task to help those projects to gain new activities.
When Wikidata is used to bring information in templates and in information
in a similar way to the Cebuano Wikipedia (but more integrated in the
overall process you get the perspective as painted in the Celtic Knot
conference and the perspective that has my support.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 29 July 2018 at 11:29, Yongmin H. <lists(a)revi.pe.kr> wrote:
Please inform Stewards' Noticeboard (and possibly
CVN people), at least.
This sounds like a lot more work for us.
Just a side note: I sometimes think langcom is just creating more work for
stewards and SWMT members without taking a look at the inactive projects
that can be closed, but I don't have an example to show you. (So treat it
as such)
--
Yongmin
Sent from my iPhone
https://reviwiki.info/
Text licensed under CC BY ND 2.0 KR
Please note that this address is list-only address and any non-mailing
list mails will be treated as spam.
Please use
https://encrypt.to/0x947f156f16250de39788c3c35b625da5beff197a
2018. 7. 28. 00:29, Steven White <Koala19890(a)hotmail.com> 작성:
I don't know if the community discussion should be on Incubator (and
advertised at Meta [and Beta]), on Meta (and advertised on Incubator [and
Beta]), or if there should be two. And when do we start it? Thoughts?
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom