7 days from proposing something (like eligibility) on this mailing list.

You are right about the rest. Deciding about the eligibility and deciding about the "final approval" are two different things.

2017-01-26 13:42 GMT+01:00 Oliver Stegen <oliver_stegen@sil.org>:

7 days from what?
If I understand correctly:
Just because a proposal has been marked "eligible" doesn't mean that it has been approved (but it is then active on the incubator). Eligible are any proposals where the language has an ISO code. Then we have to check whether requirements like translations, existence of a community and regular editing are met. Then we find an expert to verify the language under review. Only after positive verification do we recommend the shift from incubator to their own wikipedia page. Or have I missed something?


On 25-Jan-17 21:54, MF-Warburg wrote:
7 days.

By the way, the period for the proposals to the Board *was* also 7 days - before it was changed to "informing the community via meta:Talk:Langcom" (still 7 days).


2017-01-25 21:50 GMT+01:00 Milos Rancic <millosh@gmail.com>:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen@gmail.com> wrote:
> The two week period is for when we inform the board that we have come to a
> conclusion and that they may object within the two week time frame. When
> someone of the committee objects, it is a no.

What is our *internal* period after which the proposal becomes the
decision if no one objects?

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom



_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom


_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom