I did leave a question about the name on the request page [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Sheshi_Pang#Discussion].
We should consult, but it’s possible to ask the requester what he or she thinks about the naming.On 14 May 2017, at 20:33, Antony Green <toniogreen@web.de> wrote: A request has been made for Wikipedia in Sheshi Pang [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Sheshi_Pang], a Sino-Tibetan language of Nepal. However, ISO calls the language Sheshi Kham [http://www-01.sil.org/iso639-3/documentation.asp?id=kip]; the Wikipedia article groups it together with three other languages as the Kham language [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kham_language]. Ethnologue estimates 20,000 native speakers. Is there any reason not to mark this eligible? Should we use the requester's name Sheshi Pang or ISO's name Sheshi Kham? Regards, Antony -- Dr. Antony Green Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31 WE 1703 10369 Berlin, Germany E-Mail: toniogreen@web.de Mobile: +49-176-82295920 _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
-- Dr. Antony Green Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31 WE 1703 10369 Berlin, Germany E-Mail: toniogreen@web.de Mobile: +49-176-82295920