We can all agree that the criteria should be different for Wikisource. This is why creation is allowed for ancient or historical languages.

This is because the text of these things is limited, and the total amount is unlikely to increase, so of course these parts should be considered. However, it is questionable whether the same should be applied to living languages. If there is currently little original text for this language, this can be taken into account and approved, but so far nothing has been presented about it.

The sustainability has been considered considering the characteristics of Wikisource, and I have also agreed with this. But even from this point of view, I'm not sure that the project being discussed has a community. Although the community of Georgian speakers is sufficient(kawikipedia), it cannot be extended to other sister projects for approval. What I can still see is that it hasn't been edited by a native speaker in at least 2 months. And pages suffered from vandalism, and editing to revert it was a part of the recent 2 months of editing.

Who will maintain this project? A few projects that we have already approved are still maintained by global sysops. This happens despite following general sustainability criteria.

I don't think this conflicts with the views of Nicolas and Nataliia.

Sotiale

2023년 8월 5일 (토) 오전 1:19, Satdeep Gill <satdeepgill@gmail.com>님이 작성:
I agree with the arguments being made in favor of having a different criteria for Wikisource and we should create a separate Wikisource for Georgian as per what Amir says. I think the Georgian community should be able to take ownership of the project and satisfy the criteria mentioned by Amir.

Best
Satdeep


On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 16:55, Amir E. Aharoni <amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
I agree with Nicolas and Nataliia. They aren't Langcom members, but their opinion is sensible and well-explained. In Wikisource, stability is not less important than continuous activity.

(In Wikinews, each article is supposed to freeze after a short time, but the activity is supposed to be otherwise continuous, unlike in Wikisource, which may become complete in some languages at some point. Whether it actually works in the current editions of Wikinews is a separate discussion.)

So I'd say that for practical purposes, if there is a lot of content , and the community is good enough at preventing vandalism to it, that's enough for Wikisource. The current Georgian Wikisource satisfies both criteria: as far as I can see, it has many more pages than any other language in wikisource.org, and they aren't being vandalized.

בתאריך יום ו׳, 4 באוג׳ 2023, 14:12, מאת Nataliia Tymkiv ‏<ntymkiv@wikimedia.org>:
True, that community activities are important, and I think that it is important to approve all other projects. But Wikisource is a very different project, where the value would be even in its passive existence. When there are text available in that language -- and there are already a few of them -- the chances of a community being drawn to it are bigger. But in any case value for readers is really big. Maybe the rules should be different for Wikisource because of its different nature (no original text, basically)?

Best regards,
antanana / Nataliia Tymkiv
Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees

NOTICE: You may have received this message outside of your normal working hours/days, as I usually can work more as a volunteer during weekend. You should not feel obligated to answer it during your days off. Thank you in advance!



On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 10:19 AM Sotiale Wiki <sotiale.wm@gmail.com> wrote:
I am negative for approval. Whether a community is sustainable is very important, and this has been a consistent criterion.
Of course, it may be a separate issue that this takes into account the nature of the Wikisource project, but at least for now, no argument has been made that it should be taken into account.

If it's just because there are a lot of pages, we should approve all of them if they've been contributing continuously for a long time from a small number of users. Or even if there are no such users.
Betawikiversity has a Vietnamese language project with 3211 pages, which also needs to be approved according to the same criteria. But no one is running this project right now. I don't think it's appropriate for this wikiversity incubating project to have an independent domain. And the Georgian Wikisource also seems to be in a situation that is not very different when looking at recent activities.

I haven't found a good reason to change these acceptance criteria or consistency. If this is approved, there must be a convincing explanation for the approval of the project despite questioning the sustainability of the community. Otherwise, we face demands from numerous projects to be individual and to recognize exceptions.

Sotiale

2023년 8월 4일 (금) 오후 3:38, Tochi Precious <tochiprecious2@gmail.com>님이 작성:
I totally agree as well.
Let's move this forward.

On Tue, Aug 1, 2023, 6:36 AM Amir E. Aharoni <amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
Can we go back to this, please, and approve the Georgian Wikisource? It's huge, probably the largest in the multilingual Wikisource. It's strange to keep a language with so many pages on the multilingual site. And there are waves of activity, too.

--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
‪“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬


‫בתאריך שבת, 26 במרץ 2022 ב-6:42 מאת ‪MF-Warburg‬‏ <‪mfwarburg@googlemail.com‬‏>:‬
No, it doesn't fulfill the activity requirements currently. Approving makes no sense if there is no community who wants to do the "upkeep" on a separate wiki, when the content is perfectly accessible (without prefixes) on the multilingual Wikisource.

I would be interested to hear from the users who contributed this year and what they think, though. Have they already been contacted?

I only see that the user who made the most contributions (but is now inactive) has been contacted some years ago by Steven, but it seems like there was no response (<https://wikisource.org/wiki/User_talk:Giakosh#Question%3A_Are_you_interested_in_trying_to_get_a_separate_subdomain_for_Georgian_Wikisource%3F>).

Amir E. Aharoni <amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il> schrieb am Do., 24. März 2022, 20:00:
Hi!

Can we perhaps approve Georgian Wikisource already? :)

It has LOTS of pages in the Multilingual Wikisource, and recently, they were recategorized.

I can't think of a reason to keep it there.

--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
‪“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org

바이러스가 없습니다.www.avast.com
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org