Yes, that's why by "resolved" I obviously mean they seem to exist now.

Am Do., 17. Juni 2021 um 19:53 Uhr schrieb Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>:

When people ask for the development of UNICODE definitions and associated fonts, there is no such thing as "resolved" when there is a need for them.

Thanks,

       GerardM

On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 19:18, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg@googlemail.com> wrote:

Am Di., 15. Juni 2021 um 19:37 Uhr schrieb Nicolas VIGNERON <vigneron.nicolas@gmail.com>:

Hi y'all,

Sure, done: I made a comment on https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Javanese#General_discussion

That said, I would like to know where the members of the Language Committee stand on this matter.

Should it be only an advice/comment and should it be more enforced? (I know the Wikisource Community itself is on the fence and most don't have a strong opinion either way).

Thanks! I have to admit I'm not aware of the Wikisource community discussions on this matter. Would there be a good way of enforcing the use of the extension anyway? I'd think it's best to make it as easy as possible to use -- surely the practicality of the extension itself is already the best advertisement for it?

@ Gerard:

is your comment about the comment on the wiki page from 2008? I think that issue was already solved.

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org