Yes, that's why by "resolved" I
obviously mean they seem to exist now.
Am Do., 17. Juni 2021 um 19:53 Uhr schrieb Gerard Meijssen <
gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>gt;:
When people ask for the development of UNICODE
definitions and associated
fonts, there is no such thing as "resolved" when there is a need for them.
Thanks,
GerardM
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 19:18, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com>
wrote:
Am Di., 15. Juni 2021 um 19:37 Uhr schrieb Nicolas VIGNERON <
vigneron.nicolas(a)gmail.com>gt;:
Hi y'all,
Sure, done: I made a comment on
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Javan…
That said, I would like to know where the members of the Language
Committee stand on this matter.
Should it be only an advice/comment and should it be more enforced? (I
know the Wikisource Community itself is on the fence and most don't have a
strong opinion either way).
Thanks! I have to admit I'm not aware of the Wikisource community
discussions on this matter. Would there be a good way of enforcing the use
of the extension anyway? I'd think it's best to make it as easy as possible
to use -- surely the practicality of the extension itself is already the
best advertisement for it?
@ Gerard:
is your comment about the comment on the wiki page from 2008? I think
that issue was already solved.
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org