This [1] sounds like pretty valid and "maybe few" is infinitely larger
number than 0. Besides the fact that you told me the same information
~5 years ago.

The insult was intentional.

[1] http://blog.longnow.org/02009/06/01/klingon-elvish-and-esperanto-linguist-takes-a-serious-look-at-invented-languages/

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Gerard Meijssen

<gerard.meijssen@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hoi,'
> and you have it on good authority that there are native speakers of Klingon?
> Who are you fooling. At that, you are insulting.
> Thanks,
>      GerardM
>
> On 9 December 2017 at 17:10, Milos Rancic <millosh@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I suppose you have strong evidence that LFN has more native speakers
>> than Klingon or you are just an ordinary liar?
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Gerard Meijssen
>> <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hoi,
>> > In an alternate universe maybe.
>> > Thanks,
>> >      GerardM
>> >
>> > Op za 9 dec. 2017 om 13:24 schreef Milos Rancic <millosh@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> I've just said that Klingon makes more sense than LFN, as it actually
>> >> has
>> >> native speakers.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Dec 9, 2017 06:55, "Gerard Meijssen" <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hoi,
>> >>> We had Klingon at one time.. Do you really consider revisiting that ?
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>>      GerardM
>> >>>
>> >>> On 8 December 2017 at 23:22, Milos Rancic <millosh@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:58 PM, MF-Warburg
>> >>>> <mfwarburg@googlemail.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>> > Can we, by the way, define more detailed criteria for which
>> >>>> > artificial
>> >>>> > languages should be eligible?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Agreed. If we count native speakers, Klingon is, AFAIK, immediately
>> >>>> after Esperanto.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> Langcom mailing list
>> >>>> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
>> >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Langcom mailing list
>> >>> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
>> >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>> >>>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Langcom mailing list
>> >> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
>> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Langcom mailing list
>> > Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
>> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom