Hoi,
Two things....
First of all.. was Toolserver not to be decommissioned and consequently
should this tool not be going to labs?
As far as Talysh is concerned, I agree with your pov.
Thanks,
Gerard
On 29 January 2014 01:07, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
I propose to approve this.
The activity seems sufficient to me:
https://toolserver.org/~pathoschild/catanalysis/?cat=0&title=Wp/tly&…
and the most-used msgs are translated as well <
http://toolserver.org/~robin/?tool=codelookup&code=tly>tly>.
It will however be necessary that the person who verifies the content says
something about the writing system: According to Ethnologue, Arabic and
Cyrillic are used, but the test-project is in Latin script. This is a
comment from the editors about it:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Requests_for_new_languages/Wik…
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom