Hoi, Two things....
First of all.. was Toolserver not to be decommissioned and consequently should this tool not be going to labs?
As far as Talysh is concerned, I agree with your pov. Thanks, Gerard
On 29 January 2014 01:07, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
I propose to approve this. The activity seems sufficient to me:
https://toolserver.org/~pathoschild/catanalysis/?cat=0&title=Wp/tly&... and the most-used msgs are translated as well < http://toolserver.org/~robin/?tool=codelookup&code=tly%3E.
It will however be necessary that the person who verifies the content says something about the writing system: According to Ethnologue, Arabic and Cyrillic are used, but the test-project is in Latin script. This is a comment from the editors about it: https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Requests_for_new_languages/Wiki...
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom