Frankly, I had hoped to kick that question down the road a bit. But Michael's comment illustrates, to some extent, the concern with people always relying on my summaries and not digging into the discussion, especially when the discussion in lengthy.

First, let me link to the discussion again:   https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Literary_Chinese

As I've said before, I think if we were starting off from a blank slate, there would be a strong argument that we ought to allow a separate Wikisource in Literary Chinese. The analogy to Latin is actually a pretty good one. To the extent the analogy is good, it's really no more appropriate (in theory) to force Literary Chinese into a Mandarin Wikisource (or a Cantonese Wikisource) than it would be to force Latin into a French Wikisource or an Italian Wikisource.

So much for "in theory", "if we were starting off from a blank slate". But we're not, and the facts on the ground still make this a far more difficult decision in practice. I'd really encourage LangCom members to try read through the lengthy discussion. But I will still provide some key points here.

Concerning the current zhwikisource wiki and its lzh content:

• The current zhwikisource (let's call it that for now) has approximately 300,000 content pages. In the discussion, it has been estimated that at least half, and perhaps as much as 90%, of that content is Literary Chinese (lzh).  (This partly depends how you count. Some pages in Mandarin, for example, are actually author pages for authors whose writing is in Literary Chinese.)
• There are currently about 150 active contributors to zhwikisource.
• The current zhwikisource community is adamantly opposed to this proposal. It does not want lzh content separated out. The community sees it as a part of the continuum of language that it is curating.  
• Some people point out that "zhwikisource", by ordinary Wikimedia use of codes, is really "Mandarin Wikisource", not "Chinese Wikisource". That is true enough, in principle. However, excluding Literary Chinese and zhwikisource, there are five other Chinese Wikisource projects, one independent (Min-Nan) and four on oldwikisource. They total about 80 content pages, so really play a negligible role. 
• I worked hard to try to determine if Chinese political influence was adversely impacting curation of lzh content on zhwikisource.  Nobody provided evidence that there was a problem.

• One user in particular is the proposer and champion of this request. 
• He has received a small amount of support in the discussion, just about all on the theoretical grounds that Literary Chinese is as deserving of a separate project as Latin.
• In practical terms, I have tried to determine why the proposer wants a separate project. The answer I get most often is that "it's a separate language and should have a separate project". Fair enough. Yet, when I have tried to ask if there have been particular problems with lzh content on Wikisource, I have not really gotten an answer. When I have pressed, the user says zhwikisource is not curating lzh material properly—but when I ask for details, I get none—no evidence, and no description of a problem. It's not absolutely out of the question that there are language issues getting in the way. Still, that's not my sense of it. 
• Most of the current zhwikisource community feel he's trying to create his own playground to use. I'm not prepared to support that opinion. I'm also not prepared to reject that opinion.

Sent from Outlook