Reviving this discussion from a few months back.
There is now also a request on translatewiki to enable localization in Rajasthani, under the code "raj", which is a macro-language.
In November, Satdeep supported marking the proposal for the Rajasthani Wikipedia as eligible. If I interpret his other response correctly, he also recommended marking Hadauti ineligible and recommending its merging with Rajasthani.
If that's the interpretation, then I guess that it's OK to also enable raj for localization on translatewiki.
This is possibly sensible, but there are two issues:
2. According to Ethnologue, at least one individual language under the raj macrolanguage is written using the Arabic script: Gujari (
https://www.ethnologue.com/language/gju/ ). I cannot find a request for it now, but it's spoken by more than a million people, so there may be a request in the future, and if it happens, it should probably be in a separate domain. Would it be OK to have one Wikipedia in a macro-language and another in an individual language? I think that it's OK in practice, but I do ask for other committee members' confirmation.
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore