2017-04-17 13:08 GMT+03:00 Danny B. <Wikipedia.Danny.B@email.cz>:

Incubator was actually cranked up slightly before Beta Wikiversity.

https://incubator.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1 02:23, 2 June 2006
https://beta.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?oldid=1 08:59, 15 August 2006

Wikisource is 2,5 years older https://wikisource.org/w/index.php?oldid=3 00:51, 24 November 2003

The more precise answer for having Beta Wikiversity from its supporters typically is: "Wikiversity is different project than other wikis so it needs its own site."

This doesn't sound like a valid reason. If it at least explained WHAT is different, I

If there aren't any stronger arguments for keeping the Beta Wikiversity, then it should be moved to the common Incubator. I couldn't find any good arguments against moving to Incubator at the previous discussions:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Move_Beta_Wikiversity_to_Incubator
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Beta_Wikiversity

(To alleviate any doubt—I'm only talking about Wikiversity and not Wikisource or any other project.)

--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
‪“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom