Let's not forget that the creation of new wikis is stalled at the moment
for technical reasons. My motivation to advance approvals is not very high
due to it, since I dislike approving projects which are active at a time,
but might not still be active later when the technical issues are resolved
but are then created nevertheless.
Am Do., 22. Aug. 2019 um 15:21 Uhr schrieb Steven White <
I'm happy to wait for your proposal, Amir. Still,
if there is something
that is going to require LangCom approval, there needs to be something in
the proposal that compels LangCom to act within a reasonable time frame.
Yes, we're volunteers, but so are the people who are creating the projects
in Incubator (etc.), and they deserve not to have to wait a year.
I will also add that as long as I'm not so frustrated with the system that
I can stay active, I do watch the active tests on Incubator. Yes, it's
possible for me to be fooled by a hoax, as I don't usually read the
languages involved. Still, as long as Incubator/Beta/Old Wikisource are
being monitored, it needs to be a pretty robust hoax on the concerted part
of a reasonable number of contributors in order to make it all the way to
the point of approvability.
Finally, then, is the tradeoff between avoiding hoaxes and being
responsive to new-project communities. The chances that such a community
is a good-faith community that is being hurt by delay are probably much
greater than the chances that such a community is a hoax community. So
while I think we need a chance for our due diligence, we should not be
allowed an arbitrarily long time to do that due diligence, either.
Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
*From:* Langcom <langcom-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 21, 2019 8:00 AM
*To:* langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org <langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
*Subject:* Langcom Digest, Vol 70, Issue 12
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 08:52:07 +0300
From: "Amir E. Aharoni" <amir.aharoni(a)mail.huji.ac.il>
To: Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee
Subject: Re: [Langcom] Proposed amendment to LPP (was: Final approval
for four projects)
No verification at all and simply assuming good faith after some arbitrary
time is asking for trouble. There already were cases of hoaxes in the past.
Not many cases, but they did happen, and we're talking about a whole site,
even one case is major trouble.
HOWEVER, I absolutely do recognize that we have unnecessary and harmful
bottlenecks in the approval process, and because of that I'm working on
another proposal that will ease up at least some of these bottlenecks.
I've just came back from Wikimania, and I'm immediately going for a
vacation until the end of August, but after that—expect surprises,
hopefully good ones.
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
Langcom mailing list