The agency that assigns ISO codes already has a standardized terminology, which is 'constructed language.'.  I suggest going with what already exists to avoid miscommunication in the future.

---

Tochi Precious

Wikipedian in Residence at Moleskine Foundation

German/English, Igbo/English, French/English Translator| Editor|

Alumnus, Cherie Blair Foundation Mentorship Program

Zimba Women Mentor, Uganda

Ambassador, The Next Economy Nigeria

Alles ist möglich

On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 4:34 PM MF-Warburg <mfwarburg@googlemail.com> wrote:

On https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Language_proposal_policy as user suggested to use the term "constructed language" rather than "artificial language" in the policy. Seems decent enough to me. Any other thoughts?

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org