Agreed, sounds like a reasonable request, and the points about ISO's terminology are of course sound.
ons. 5. feb. 2025, 14:09 skrev Tochi Precious tochiprecious2@gmail.com:
The agency that assigns ISO codes already has a standardized terminology, which is '*constructed language.'. *I suggest going with what already exists to avoid miscommunication in the future.
Tochi Precious *Wikipedian in Residence at Moleskine Foundation* *German/English, Igbo/English, French/English Translator| Editor|* *Alumnus, Cherie Blair Foundation Mentorship Program* *Zimba Women Mentor, Uganda* *Ambassador, The Next Economy Nigeria*
*Alles ist möglich*
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 4:34 PM MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
On https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Language_proposal_policy as user suggested to use the term "constructed language" rather than "artificial language" in the policy. Seems decent enough to me. Any other thoughts? _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org