So... This raises several questions.
I am inclined to answer "yes" to both questions, but with a caveat. I know very little about the Armenian language. My support is based mainly on Michael's conclusions of the examination of the differences between Eastern and Western varieties. However, the documents linked from the first email in this thread mention the similarity of the situation with Montengrin, which the committee seems not to support.
If we reject Montenegrin, but support Western Armenian, we'll have to explain it.