Hi.
Some contributors are socks, but even excluding them, I believe that the
activities of contributors to this project meet the general criteria.
I'm not against the approval, but random sampling finds quite a few pages
that are actually empty or very short. It has only headings or no content,
only categories.
In my opinion, they need to supplement the content before the wiki is
created.
Regards,
Sotiale
2022년 8월 16일 (화) 오후 11:13, Jon Harald Søby <jhsoby(a)gmail.xn--com>-4f21ay07k 작성:
Not as far as I know, searching Angika in my archives
only had some hits
from ~2011. I believe Satdeep can help with this though.
tir. 16. aug. 2022 kl. 16:05 skrev Amir E. Aharoni <
amir.aharoni(a)mail.huji.ac.il>gt;:
I support it. Is there expert approval?
בתאריך יום ג׳, 16 באוג׳ 2022, 17:01, מאת Jon Harald Søby <
jhsoby(a)gmail.com>gt;:
Hello all,
I would like to suggest the approval of the Angika Wikipedia (anpwiki)
[1].
They have had stable activity all year [2], and the most used messages
are almost fully translated [3] (only 6 missing messages, but that can be
done in a few minutes).
[1]
https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/anp
[2]
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/anp&…
[3]
https://codelookup.toolforge.org/anp
--
mvh
Jon Harald Søby
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
--
mvh
Jon Harald Søby
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org