+1 from me as well
--
Oliver Stegen, PhD
Linguistics Consultant, SIL Uganda-Tanzania
On 30-Nov-15 11:26 PM, Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
Yes, let's approve them.
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2015-11-30 16:53 GMT+02:00 Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com
<mailto:millosh@gmail.com>>:
Yes, from "Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee"... My Gmail has
taken this description by default from somebody...
So, first, MF-Warburg says Georgian Wikisource should go regularly.
I suggest Neapolitan Wikisource should go fast forward.
And I suggest we amend the rules which would say something like "After
the first project created, community can get Wikisource at any point
of time." -- or whatever appropriate.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com <mailto:gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hoi,
You are not. My bad, it shows as wikimedia, I thought it was
wikimedia-l
Thanks,
GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 15:24, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com
<mailto:millosh@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Gerard, we are talking here via the list
langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:langcom@lists.wikimedia.org>. Am I
> missing something?
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen
> <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com <mailto:gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>>
wrote:
>>
>> Hoi,
>> The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language
committee.
All
>> its members are subscribed to that one.
>> Thanks,
>> GerardM
>>
>> On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com
<mailto:millosh@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg
<mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com <mailto:mfwarburg@googlemail.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I don't understand. If ka.ws <http://ka.ws> fulfills the
activity requirements, it can
>>>> be approved. Did anyone check it
already?
>>>
>>> No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually
asked that
>>> inside of the first email.
>>>
>>> On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests
approval
much
>>> quicker, as in the most of the new
requests, it will be used
for language
>>> preservation.
>>>
>>> Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong
>>> mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss
this in your
> opinion?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org>
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom