Re new members: How am I supposed to gauge whether a newly
proposed LangCom member is proactive enough to pass muster?
In more general terms: Do we need a discussion on this list about
our functionality?
I've just seen that there was a discussion about LangCom on Meta
about a month ago (https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Forum&diff=prev&oldid=11635136#Is_the_Language_Committee_still_active.3F).
Fine, so I'm considered active - but I'm only really active on
this mailing list (and on sw:wp and by extension on wikidata but
that's a different matter). If someone contacts me on a talk page,
chances are that I won't respond. And I also don't feel
comfortable engaging in discussions outside of this mailing list.
SO: Is it sufficient for me to react to posts on this mailing list
which concern my agreement or disagreement with regard to a new
language project? Or do you, my fellow LangCom members, prefer for
me to resign if I don't feel able to be more proactive than that?
Fwiw,
Oliver
On 16-Apr-15 9:22 AM, Santhosh
Thottingal wrote:
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Request for Membership
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 06:19:01 +0000 (UTC)
From: Rehmat Aziz Chitrali <rachitrali@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: Rehmat Aziz Chitrali <rachitrali@yahoo.com>
To: langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <langcom@lists.wikimedia.org>
Dear sirs,
I am Test Wiki Administrator at Wiki Incubator projects Pakistan. I want
to become member of Language Committee from Pakistan.
Rehmat Aziz Chitrali,Gold Medalist
Linguist & Culture Researcher
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom