Hello Jon and thank you for the proposal,
I took a look at the Mossi Wikipedia, and indeed it seems that there is a good activity there, ans also the quality of many existing articles is really good. However, there are some points that I think need to be taken into consideration before moving forward:
1- many articles (even the bigger ones) do not have a single reference, and come of them are messy with just big chunks of text or very short (example: Busa, Guure). If these editors will be the future administrators, I think that they really need to be trained before. What do you think?
2- the home page is fully written in English. This probably needs to be fixed before approval?
3- the infoboxes bring information from Wikidata, but this is problematic because (a) they are very big with not always relevant information, and (b) none of the items is translated and all of them are in English. This is also something the editors need probably to look into?
I hope that this feedback is helpful, but so far, well done for the Mossi community!
Best regards,
Anass
Hi all,
I would like to propose the approval of the Mooré/Mossi Wikipedia (Wp/mos) [1]. The activity has been stable for several months [2], and the translation of the most important messages is done [3].
We will, however, need verification. I'm sure Sadik can help find someone to verify it.
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
Skickat från Gmail Mobile