Re new members: How am I supposed to gauge whether a newly proposed LangCom member is proactive enough to pass muster?

In more general terms: Do we need a discussion on this list about our functionality?
I've just seen that there was a discussion about LangCom on Meta about a month ago (https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Forum&diff=prev&oldid=11635136#Is_the_Language_Committee_still_active.3F).
Fine, so I'm considered active - but I'm only really active on this mailing list (and on sw:wp and by extension on wikidata but that's a different matter). If someone contacts me on a talk page, chances are that I won't respond. And I also don't feel comfortable engaging in discussions outside of this mailing list.

SO: Is it sufficient for me to react to posts on this mailing list which concern my agreement or disagreement with regard to a new language project? Or do you, my fellow LangCom members, prefer for me to resign if I don't feel able to be more proactive than that?

Fwiw,
Oliver

On 16-Apr-15 9:22 AM, Santhosh Thottingal wrote:


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Request for Membership
Date: 	Thu, 16 Apr 2015 06:19:01 +0000 (UTC)
From: 	Rehmat Aziz Chitrali <rachitrali@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: 	Rehmat Aziz Chitrali <rachitrali@yahoo.com>
To: 	langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <langcom@lists.wikimedia.org>



Dear sirs,

I am Test Wiki Administrator at Wiki Incubator projects Pakistan. I want
to become member of Language Committee from Pakistan.

Rehmat Aziz Chitrali,Gold Medalist
Linguist & Culture Researcher






_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom