More discussion by two nl:wn contributors at [1], including the request for LangCom to stick to our own rule of responding to requests within 7 days (I don't think they read that correctly; it's about internal voting that have the 7-day deadline, isn't it? Or have I misunderstood?).

Currently the response is 1:1 concerning letting them go live (although, I may be less certain in my vote than Gerard in his, so am willing to be swayed to stay neutral). Still, even if granting their request, shouldn't we at least point out that they stick to rules like original reporting and similar guidelines?

Let's resolve this soon, please.

[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#No_answers_from_Language_committ.C3.A9e


On 29-May-17 22:13, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
I had some conversations with people in the Dutch community. One thought was that Wikipedia already serves this role. Another was that it has failed before. My opinion is that these are new people and when the requirements are fulfilled they can have another go.
Thanks,
      GerardM

On 29 May 2017 at 21:08, Amir E. Aharoni <amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
Hi,

and there were different opinions.

I'm neutral about this matter. Does anybody in the committee have a particular opinion on it?

--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
‪“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom



Virus-free. www.avg.com 


_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom