I am well aware of the recent discussion here about a "subtag" for Simple English (at which, however, something like "en-x-wpsimple" was mentioned, not en-simple).However, that doesn't mean it now has an ISO 639-1 or -3 code as our policy requires and that also doesn't prejudice Langcom's decision on the eligibility.
2016-02-06 16:42 GMT+01:00 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>:
Hoi,That is just a matter of asking for inclusion in the standard. Michael is well placed to do so.Thanks,Gerard
On 6 February 2016 at 16:39, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg@googlemail.com> wrote:
Who decided that?
2016-02-06 16:20 GMT+01:00 Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com>:
en-simple.wikipedia.org is now permitted.
> On 5 Feb 2016, at 15:59, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> There is a proposal at <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikiversity_Simple_English>
>
> IMHO, this needs to be rejected, as "Simple English courses" can easily be hosted on en.wikiversity (also, there is of course no ISO code).
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom