Hoi,
Agreed.
Gerard
On 7 October 2014 07:47, Antony Green <toniogreen(a)web.de> wrote:
I support both these proposals and would remind
everyone that English
Wikisource also hosts Old English texts, so there is no need for a separate
ang-wikisource.
Antony
On 07.10.2014 02:41, MF-Warburg wrote:
Hi all,
we have several closure proposals which should be decided... Here are
the first two:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_O…
Reasons are outlined on the page; the majority of users agrees.
To summarize:
- Wikibooks is for textbooks and manuals, but nobody is writing them in
this extinct language nor is there much reason why someone would want to
/read/ them.
Wikisource is the project that should exist for this language.
In fact, some pages on the wiki do belong to Wikisource, and should be
moved there. This is also consistent with Langcom's previous decisions that
ancient languages should above all have Wikisource, but the other projects
are not all suitable for them.
=> I propose: Close, move content to Incubator, or, where appropriate,
to Wikisoure.
----
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_I…
The wiki is a case of "absence of content since its creation". Of the
few page, some should even be moved to Wiktionary (as some people noted in
the discussion).
=> I propose: Close, move content to Incubator, or, where appropriate,
to Wiktionary.
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing
listLangcom@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
--
Dr. Antony Green
Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31, WE 1703
10369 Berlin, Germany
Phone: +49 (0)30 34 50 98 97
Mobile: +49 (0)163 370 08 27
E-mail: toniogreen(a)web.de
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org