Понедельник, 27 апреля 2015, 2:28 +02:00 от MF-Warburg
<mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com>om>:
We had a discussion about the eligibility in March, there was no conclusion, but so far
nobody brought up problems either... though I'm still a bit wary because we already
had a fair share of problems with such languages which are macrolanguages with Southern,
Eastern, Northern etc. subdivisions. But at least there is an ISO 639-3 code.
The most-used msgs are complete.
Activity is sustained by at least 3 editors since February (so 3 months now at the end of
April), which is ok (though the most active contributor in this month is a bot).
I find Gerard's question interesting - anyone can look at
https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:PrefixIndex/wp/bgn to find out - I will try
to do this tomorrow and inform you all.
2015-04-22 20:30 GMT+02:00 Amir E. Aharoni < amir.aharoni(a)mail.huji.ac.il > :
Hi,
I received a few requests to check the status of Western Balochi incubator (bgn).
The code bgn is legit, the translation of most-used messages is complete, and the activity
in the incubator is reasonable. A lot of pages are written; many are just one or two lines
long, but I don't think that I mind.
Do we want to verify that it's the right language?
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom