I am negative for approval. Whether a community is sustainable is very important, and this has been a consistent criterion.Of course, it may be a separate issue that this takes into account the nature of the Wikisource project, but at least for now, no argument has been made that it should be taken into account.
If it's just because there are a lot of pages, we should approve all of them if they've been contributing continuously for a long time from a small number of users. Or even if there are no such users.
Betawikiversity has a Vietnamese language project with 3211 pages, which also needs to be approved according to the same criteria. But no one is running this project right now. I don't think it's appropriate for this wikiversity incubating project to have an independent domain. And the Georgian Wikisource also seems to be in a situation that is not very different when looking at recent activities.
I haven't found a good reason to change these acceptance criteria or consistency. If this is approved, there must be a convincing explanation for the approval of the project despite questioning the sustainability of the community. Otherwise, we face demands from numerous projects to be individual and to recognize exceptions.
Sotiale
