Well, has the ongoing discussion within langcom regarding them been resolved?
Otherwise, I think this should be a step towards getting advice on how to solve the problem, rather than a verification process that presupposes approval.

Sotiale

2024년 10월 15일 (화) 오전 9:56, Amir E. Aharoni <amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il>님이 작성:
I support it. Do we have expert verification?

--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
‪“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬


‫בתאריך יום ב׳, 14 באוק׳ 2024 ב-20:49 מאת ‪Satdeep Gill‬‏ <‪satdeepgill@gmail.com‬‏>:‬
Hi all,

I propose the approval of Sylheti Wikipedia. They have consistently met the minimum criteria for over a year and half now and most important MediaWiki messages have already been translated:


Regards 
Satdeep Gill
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org