- I have asked the Gorontalo test community if it has access to any language experts (professors or linguists) for language verification. I suggested to them that ideally such an expert would
be someone who has had no substantial involvement with the test so far. However, as a backup, I suggested to them that someone who has been involved, but who has really unambiguous credentials, might be good enough. (My own personal opinion is that it has
to be; if projects are going to remain frozen in Incubator because nobody can find a language expert, then we might as well tell people in such test communities not to bother. And I don't think we want to do that.) As an aside, the Ingush Wikipedia test has
been waiting for language verification for months; I intend to ask them along the same lines if they have access to any experts.
- I think LangCom needs to decide what it considers to be an acceptable conlang and what it doesn't. The LFN test project team has been working hard and seriously on this project for months. The language is a serious attempt at
an auxiliary language, and isn't a construction for a fictional world like Klingon or the Tolkien languages, so I don't think there is a concern that LFN Wikipedia would be considered a frivolous project. And LFN has more speakers than a couple of other conlangs
that have Wikipedias already (albeit grandfathered ones). Bottom line: as proposals on conlang projects go, this is going to be about as good as it gets. If nevertheless you decide not to approve this project, then I think you really need to decide on some
criteria, or decide that you are not going to accept any new conlangs at all.
Respectfully,
Steven White (User:StevenJ81)