Let alone the fact that moving wikis is impossible anyway at the moment.
I agree with Michael. Moving az to azj is unnecessary and would cause more problems than it would solve.
On 2015-05-12 11:55, Michael Everson wrote:
On 12 May 2015, at 09:17, Mjbmr <mjbmri@gmail.com> wrote:
After a lot of researches I'm in favor of moving az to azj.I oppose this. That would break many existing links. We also did not move Bokmål from no to nb.
In the bibliographical world, az is used primarily for the national language of the state of Azerbaijan. The overwhelming majority of text in any Azeri language is in Northern Azeri, whether in Cyrillic or in Latin. Southern Azeri does not have the same place in the educational system of Iran, for instance. There is much less text in it.
We should add azb and move Arabic-script articles there and leave az alone.
I have fundamental opposition to moving az to azj.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
--
Dr. Antony Green
Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31, WE 1703
10369 Berlin, Germany
Phone: +49 (0)30 34 50 98 97
Mobile: +49 (0)176 82 29 59 20
E-mail: toniogreen@web.de
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom