Let alone the fact that moving wikis is impossible anyway at the moment.
Am 12.05.2015 12:00 schrieb "Antony Green" <toniogreen(a)web.de>de>:
I agree with Michael. Moving az to azj is unnecessary
and would cause more
problems than it would solve.
On 2015-05-12 11:55, Michael Everson wrote:
On 12 May 2015, at 09:17, Mjbmr
<mjbmri(a)gmail.com> wrote:
After a lot of researches I'm in favor of moving az to azj.
I oppose this. That would break many
existing links. We also did not move
Bokmål from no to nb.
In the bibliographical world, az is used primarily for the national
language of the state of Azerbaijan. The overwhelming majority of text in
any Azeri language is in Northern Azeri, whether in Cyrillic or in Latin.
Southern Azeri does not have the same place in the educational system of
Iran, for instance. There is much less text in it.
We should add azb and move Arabic-script articles there and leave az
alone.
I have fundamental opposition to moving az to azj.
Michael Everson *
http://www.evertype.com/
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
--
Dr. Antony Green
Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31, WE 1703
10369 Berlin, Germany
Phone: +49 (0)30 34 50 98 97
Mobile: +49 (0)176 82 29 59 20
E-mail: toniogreen(a)web.de
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom