[https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Computer_graphics/2013-2014/Page_footer]
See Here.

On 6/25/17, Mahir Morshed <mmorshe2@illinois.edu> wrote:
> Well, the part in [brackets] was "the lack of effort to even localize the
> comments in the code samples" and I did mention that it was being addressed
> slowly. My apologies for failing to provide a direct link to an example.
>
> I also now see that the email address is in fact yours. I am not sure that
> there is any precedent elsewhere for such byline templates on other
> Wikimedia projects.
>
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Jay prakash <0freerunning@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> You are showing it that you will not see all those links which I have
>> cleaned like it [https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/कंप्यूटर
>> ग्राफिक्स/2013-14/जीओजीएल-टेम्पलेट].
>>
>> On 6/25/17, Mahir Morshed <mmorshe2@illinois.edu> wrote:
>> > To piggyback on what Justin is saying (and also via Phabricator:
>> > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T168765#3376191):
>> >
>> > I am not a Hindi speaker, but I can at least discern Devanagari text
>> > and
>> > the English loanwords in it. Justin's first link is to
>> > "Category:Intelligence" with subcategory "Artificial intelligence". His
>> > second link (Computer Programming/IDE/Visual Basic .NET/...) bears only
>> > a
>> > link to a Japanese online IDE. His third link (Computer
>> > Graphics/2013-2014/"Page Foot", a page footer which is transcluded
>> > elsewhere) has an email address prefixed with a link to
>> > @Jayprakash12345
>> > <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/p/Jayprakash12345/>'s
>> userpage--maybe it
>> > is his own email address?
>> >
>> > The problems of most pages only consisting of source code is indeed
>> > inherited from the English Wikiversity courses to which the pages are
>> > linked. Nevertheless, from seeing at least [the lack of effort to even
>> > localize the comments in the code samples], and perhaps from seeing the
>> > lack of something more substantial in the way of content revolving
>> > around
>> > those code samples, and perhaps more so from Jayprakash12345 being the
>> only
>> > consistent contributor going back at least a month, I must thus agree
>> with
>> > his assessment that opening hiwikiversity would be a disaster. My
>> personal
>> > opinion is that other Hindi projects (such as hiwikisource and
>> hiwikiquote)
>> > could be populated more easily and meaningfully at this point, but I
>> would
>> > digress to elaborate on that and the whole process of site requests
>> > more
>> > generally here.
>> >
>> > (Edits since the original comment was made: It appears judging from
>> > https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Special:RecentChangesLinked/Category:
>> HI
>> > that 1) the subcategory "Artificial intelligence" has been deleted and
>> > 2)
>> > the part in [brackets] above is being addressed slowly.)
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Justin Anthony Knapp
>> > <justinkoavf@gmail.com
>> >> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Via Phabricator (https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T168765#3376166):
>> >>
>> >> Is this really ready? I don't read Hindi but the main category has 84
>> >> subcategories and 25 are empty (many only have subcategories which are
>> >> themselves empty, such as https://beta.wikiversity.org/
>> >> wiki/Category:इंटेलिजेंस) There are 578 pieces of content, many of
>> >> which
>> >> are just one or two lines, such as https://beta.wikiversity.org/
>> >> wiki/कंप्यूटर_प्रोग्रामिंग/IDE/विजुअल_बेसिक_.नेट/Online/Free or
>> >> https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/कंप्यूटर_ग्राफिक्स/2013-2014/पेज_फ़ुट
>> >> which is mostly someone's personal email address. Remove categories
>> >> and
>> >> erroneously-categorized userpages and that becomes 490. This includes
>> >> almost 100 pages which are part of some Linux code such as
>> >> https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/लिनक्स/linux-0.01.tar/boot/boot.s.
>> >> Remove *those* and it's 401 which includes purely cosmetic templates
>> >> and
>> >> pages like
>> >> https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Portal:Engineering/box-footer.
>> >> The actual amount of content seems like something that one person
>> >> could
>> >> make over a long weekend. How is this supposed to be a live project?
>> This
>> >> seems like a misstep.
>> >>
>> >> Creating a new project is a big responsibility and with 500 pages in
>> five
>> >> and a half years? And most of them are either copy-pasted Linux code
>> >> or
>> >> one
>> >> line long? That is not a thriving community. This is a recipe for
>> >> disaster.
>> >>
>> >> --JAK
>> >> --
>> >> "[Icarus] glances up and is caught, wondrously tunneling into that hot
>> >> eye. Who cares that he fell back to the sea?"
>> >>
>> >> Viva Western Sahara, viva West Papua
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Langcom mailing list
>> >> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
>> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
>> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Yours sincerely,
> Mahir Morshed
> University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
> B.S. Computer Engineering, May 2019
>

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom