Hoi,
Please do not conflate issues. 

For Serbian among others we have a system where the Latin script and the Cyrillic script are transcribed automatically. When the additional characters are used in a predictable way, it could be that these differences are automated as well.
Thanks,
      GerardM

On 9 January 2018 at 04:58, Phake Nick <c933103@gmail.com> wrote:

How can one prove that the language is sufficiently different that reader cannot use the other wiki? There were already some lingulistic evidence being sent onto the mailing list previously but seems like that is not considered enough to prove sufficient uniqueness?

If I understand correctly, when tried hard enough, a Portuguese reader can also understand Spanish wiki, does that mean Spanish wiki is enough and there'd be no need for Portuguese wiki?

2018年1月9日 08:52 於 "Michael Everson" <everson@evertype.com> 寫道:
>
> […]
>
> The Montenegrins can PROVE to us that their Wikipedia will be different from the Serbian one by demonstrating how it differs and showing that their readers cannot use the Serbian Wiki.
>
> They have to at least TRY. This is not like Belarusian. This is not like English, even,
>
> Michael Everson
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom


_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom