Hoi,
Please do not conflate issues.
For Serbian among others we have a system where the Latin script and the
Cyrillic script are transcribed automatically. When the additional
characters are used in a predictable way, it could be that these
differences are automated as well.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 9 January 2018 at 04:58, Phake Nick <c933103(a)gmail.com> wrote:
How can one prove that the language is sufficiently
different that reader
cannot use the other wiki? There were already some lingulistic evidence
being sent onto the mailing list previously but seems like that is not
considered enough to prove sufficient uniqueness?
If I understand correctly, when tried hard enough, a Portuguese reader can
also understand Spanish wiki, does that mean Spanish wiki is enough and
there'd be no need for Portuguese wiki?
2018年1月9日 08:52 於 "Michael Everson" <everson(a)evertype.com> 寫道：
[…]
The Montenegrins can PROVE to us that their Wikipedia will be different
from the
Serbian one by demonstrating how it differs and showing that their
readers cannot use the Serbian Wiki.
They have to at least TRY. This is not like Belarusian. This is not like
English,
even,
Michael Everson
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom