I agree, but may you give us your opinion in relation to the fact that
Dogri has been split in Ethnologue [1] into "Dogri proper" [2] and
Kangri [3]?

I think we should go with the "dgo" code, unless there is a strong
reason to keep it under the "macrolanguage" code. (It is also quite
possible that SIL/Ethnologue didn't have the best clue when approving
the codes.)

BTW, that's why I've omitted Dogri during the first pass.

[1] https://www.ethnologue.com/language/doi
[2] https://www.ethnologue.com/language/dgo
[3] https://www.ethnologue.com/language/xnr

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Satdeep Gill <satdeepgill@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The first Indic language request I saw today was a request for Wikipedia
> Dorgi.[1]
>
> Dogri is one of the 22 scheduled languages of India.[2] The Wikipedia
> article mentions that Dogri is written in both Devanagari and Perso-Arabic
> scripts. I personally have known Dogri to be written in Devanagari and
> certain books published by the Government of India have also used Devanagari
> script.[3]
>
> The person who proposed the project has also used Devanagari script while
> writing the language name in the language.
>
> Hence, I suggest marking this proposal eligible for a Dogri Wikipedia in
> Devanagari Language.
>
> [1]
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Dogri
> [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogri_language
> [3] http://english.bharatavani.in/book/dogri-dogri-dictionary-part-1/
>
> --
> Regards
> Satdeep Gill
> +91-9465155746
>

> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom