Any language member can veto such a highly decision, but if he
doesn't do anything and wasting the time, other langcom member
better decide. btw, that's why iso639-3 is for, there is no need
to discuss this with az project to see if they will allow creation
of azb project.
On 5/8/2015 11:42 AM, Oliver Stegen
wrote:
Gerard,
I really see the need of LangCom face-to-face meetings as some
issues seem to be impossible to discuss by email.
Anyway, in the face of not being able to meet in person, let's
try again by this imperfect medium riddled with potential
misunderstandings ... *sigh*
How do you propose to receive feedback from az wikipedia? I
understand that az wikipedia members are not able to communicate
with each other in writing. The recent crisis has shown that the
az community is deeply divided. For most LangCom members that
seems to be enough evidence to split az wikipedia in two.
LangCom has the mandate to make such decisions. Please make a
constructive proposal asap so that LangCom will not be accused
again to delay urgent matters. Thanks.
Oliver
On 08-May-15 8:08 AM, Gerard
Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
A blanket statements means that I do not put a date on
it. So I am dead against without clarification what the az
wikipedia wants. Not having this feedback I reserve
judgement until a later date.
Thanks,
GerardM
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom