Continuing requests for no new reason only increases the burden. Considering that it usually takes a considerable amount of time for a request to be rejected unless it is obvious, one option is to allow them to submit a proposal up to 3 times without limit, but only after a certain period of time has elapsed after being rejected. I would suggest specifying this period between 3 and 6 months.

Since I think that prior consultation with langcom will probably be the same as an appeal, the appeal will also be covered.

Regards,

Sotiale

2022년 2월 25일 (금) 오후 12:27, Jan Wohlgemuth <linguist@spamcop.net>님이 작성:

If such a blacklist is implemented, I would suggest to allow for request
no. 2 (like an appeal) and start blocking with re-request no 3 and
higher.
best,
Jan

Am 24.02.2022 00:29, schrieb MF-Warburg:
> Here's the newest iteration of the request
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Middle_English_5>
> which I take it is obviously getting rejected.
>
> At this opportunity, I wonder whether we should implement some
> limitation (e.g. via Titleblacklist) against creating request no. 2,
> 3, 4, 5 without discussing it with Langcom first. It's a bit pointless
> to reject requests over and over again, just because people don't
> accept the policy and create a new one. Meanwhile, if for example a
> language was previously rejected but has now been recognized in ISO
> 639-3, that can be easily signalled and a new request created.
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org

--
Dr. Jan Wohlgemuth
Depok, Indonesia
www.linguist.de | www.linguisten.de | www.glottopedia.org
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org