Hello,
Actually the policy allows closing projects "which don't have content or existing content is insignificant" (type one). In this case, mgwikibooks falls under that clause totally in my opinion:
- only one editor has been somewhat active there for 10 years and has not really objected to the closure,
- existing content is insignificant; there's not even a single finished book and most content is of the type of <
https://mg.wikibooks.org/wiki/Jeografia>, if anything, only the Python book may need to be transferred to the Incubator (~10 short pages).
- and community seems to be supportive to the idea of closing the project due to its lack of content and inactivity.
Given all of the above, I invite the LangCom to vote for closing the project.
Thanks, MA.
That is only appropriate if the current content is actually junk. If it's legitimate, either it gets transferred or the original project stays open.
MA, current policy is not to close projects unless they are infested with spam. I am quite worried that if we close this we will end up closing many others. That might well make the lives of stewards and GS a little easier, but it mostly runs against the grain
of WMF's mission.