Hoi,

Maybe but there are discussions in parallel and this one affects another. There obvious parallels and I do not want this to be an excuse.

For the record I am against at approving under the current circumstances.

Thanks,

Gerard

PS Thanks :)

On 7 May 2015 at 10:42, Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com> wrote:

On 7 May 2015, at 09:31, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com> wrote:

> Everything is nor easy not obvious. ku.wikipedia existed prior to the existence of the language committee. Kurdish is a macro language and it would not be accepted at this time.

Talk about the tail wagging the dog.

The code “ku" existed for a long time before Wikipedia. It is only SIL that re-defined it in Ethnologue and we know SIL isn’t perfect. Same as “no" for Norwegian.

Gerard, you are blocking progress on ideological grounds. Where exactly do you expect feedback? By what date? In what form?

Happy birthday, by the way. :-) Sorry we are disputing, but I don’t think your position on this is wise.

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom