Of the cases requesting follow-up, I'm aware of the following:
1. request for closure of be-tarask is to be rejected (i.e. be-tarask
2. request for closure of Nahuatl is to be rejected (further steps are
still discussed but LangCom seems to have consensus not to close
3. Gorontalo wikipedia needs verification; I'm not aware of anyone
knowing a language expert to do that.
4. Lingua Franca Nova wikipedia is controversial indeed; I don't see
that LangCom has a consensus on this, so the approval seems to be at
Ad 1 and 2, the action of request rejection should be taken after 7 days
(unless other LangCom members object, i.e. support and argue for closure
of one and/or the other).
Ad 3 and 4, we're open to further suggestions but at this stage,
progress has stagnated :(
On 27-Oct-17 20:52, James Heilman wrote: