Klingon has a ridiculously limited vocabulary. LFN is as interesting and useful as
Esperanto, and has a large and preactical vocabulary. I favour inclusiveness. It costs us
little.
On 31 Jan 2017, at 17:48, Oliver Stegen
<oliver_stegen(a)sil.org> wrote:
Please note that SIL accepted a change request (submitted by the inventor of this
language, cf.
http://www-01.sil.org/iso639-3/cr_files/2007-144.pdf) but Ethnologue did not
include lfn in their editions ever.
So? That’s Ethnologue’s business.
Given that LFN has a wiki on Wikia (cf.
http://lfn.wikia.com/wiki/Paje_xef), I don't see why we should accept it as a
Wikimedia project. Let it go the way of Klingon ...