I am all for lowering criteria to 200 messages for all. May we conclude
that we will change the policy that way?
(BTW, I it seems that I don't have write permissions on the list from my @
gmail.com account.)
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:32 PM, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com>
wrote:
This is not formalistic nonsense, but fair rules which
are the same for
everyone.
Am 11.03.2015 18:29 schrieb "Gerard Meijssen"
<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hoi.
I am increasingly frustrated by this formalistic
nonsense. Yes you can
object but what do you achieve ? Nothing at all, you are impeding where an
organisation indicates that it will do what is needed when the project is
live.
Frustration means not as much involvement. That is what it does to me.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 11 March 2015 at 16:18, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
On the very same page I see 594 messages in total
in that group, 286
thereof still to translate.
Am 11.03.2015 16:08 schrieb "Santhosh Thottingal" <
santhosh.thottingal(a)gmail.com>gt;:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:32 PM, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com>
wrote:
> No, for the first project in a language, as it is the case here, the
> 500 most-used messages should be translated.
>
translatewiki.net stats page
<https://translatewiki.net/w/i.php?title=Special:LanguageStats&language=gom-deva&group=core-0-mostused>
says
592 most-used messages translated.
Santhosh
_______________________________________________
Langcom-l mailing list
Langcom-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom-l
_______________________________________________
Langcom-l mailing list
Langcom-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom-l
_______________________________________________
Langcom-l mailing list
Langcom-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom-l
_______________________________________________
Langcom-l mailing list
Langcom-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom-l