Ethnologue and Glottolog appear to agree on the independent language status of the variety, and the sources cited are seemingly sharing a consensus. I'd second your inclination._______________________________________________Amir E. Aharoni <amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il>, 17 Oca 2025 Cum, 17:33 tarihinde şunu yazdı:_______________________________________________Hi,There's a new request:The code is valid, and the language is living, but it may be very close to Komering (kge), in which there is a Wikipedia already. Or maybe it's a similar, but sufficiently distinct language in the same subgroup or dialect continuum or something. I'm not entirely sure.See also a little discussion about it here:I'm inclined to mark it as eligible, but I welcome other opinions.
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org