Gerard,

I really see the need of LangCom face-to-face meetings as some issues seem to be impossible to discuss by email.
Anyway, in the face of not being able to meet in person, let's try again by this imperfect medium riddled with potential misunderstandings ... *sigh*

How do you propose to receive feedback from az wikipedia? I understand that az wikipedia members are not able to communicate with each other in writing. The recent crisis has shown that the az community is deeply divided. For most LangCom members that seems to be enough evidence to split az wikipedia in two. LangCom has the mandate to make such decisions. Please make a constructive proposal asap so that LangCom will not be accused again to delay urgent matters. Thanks.

Oliver

On 08-May-15 8:08 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:

Hoi,

A blanket statements means that I do not put a date on it. So I am dead against without clarification what the az wikipedia wants. Not having this feedback I reserve judgement until a later date.

Thanks,

      GerardM

On 7 May 2015 at 22:08, Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com> wrote:

On 7 May 2015, at 10:05, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com> wrote:

> Maybe but there are discussions in parallel and this one affects another. There obvious parallels and I do not want this to be an excuse.

Answer my questions.

Where exactly do you expect feedback? By what date? In what form?

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/


_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom