It is said that they initially used kr like knc. And it seemed like they decided to make knc their domain.

According to their answers, the microlanguages under kr do not communicate well with knc.

What they want is the knc domain. Of course, their language responses need to be reviewed by experts.

Anyway, the important thing now seems to be about the translationwiki.

Can I ask them if this(translationwiki kr) is all in knc? Or should we discuss whether it should be referred to as kr after expert verification?

Sotiale

2024년 4월 9일 (화) 오후 7:33, Amir E. Aharoni <amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il>님이 작성:

I can enable knc for translation, but I am wondering: Is there still use for kr? Will there ever be? Or maybe the kr translations can be moved to knc? I tried to reach an expert, but didn't succeed.

--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
‪“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬

‫בתאריך יום ג׳, 9 באפר׳ 2024 ב-2:46 מאת ‪MF-Warburg‬‏ <‪mfwarburg@googlemail.com‬‏>:‬
Please see <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Kanuri>. There's an active project at Wp/knc. Interface translation however is not enabled for knc, but for kr: <https://codelookup.toolforge.org/knc>, <https://codelookup.toolforge.org/kr>.
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave@lists.wikimedia.org