It makes sense to be as encouraging as possible, so I'd go with Option #1.
After all, automatic conversion should be fairly easy.
Steven White <koala19890(a)hotmail.com>om>, 20 Kas 2019 Çar, 15:40 tarihinde
şunu yazdı:
Does anyone have *any* thoughts on this?
Steven
Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
------------------------------
*From:* Steven White
*Sent:* Friday, November 8, 2019 10:53 AM
*To:* WMF LangCom (public) <langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
*Subject:* Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Khorasani Turkic
See
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Khoras…
.
In theory, this request should be eligible. And while the test project has
been mostly dormant over the last seven years, it objectively has been
active enough not to reject as "stale". However, the project is entirely
written in Latin script, which Ethnologue does not indicate is a valid
script for the language. Over a year ago, I put the request on hold,
pending conversion of the contents to Perso-Arabic, but no action has been
taken. So which of the three actions below does the committee think I
should take here?
1. Mark "eligible", but note on the request page that the project will
under no conditions merit final approval unless written in Perso-Arabic.
2. Mark "rejected", inviting the community to reapply when the test is
converted to Perso-Arabic.
3. Leave as "on hold" indefinitely, awaiting conversion to
Perso-Arabic.
Personally, I favor #1, but mainly because I don't like keeping projects
on indefinite hold, as I think that makes us look indecisive and pokey. But
I could live with #3 in this particular case.
Thoughts?
Steven
Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom