Thanks for the mention!

Yes, it looks good to me, although my Mac has some problems with the "comma tone", but that's also the case when I write something in Shan. I am positively surprized about the number of articles and that many of them aren't just stubs but actually quite long (I don't speak Shan fluently enough to actually read through an entire long article before getting tired). I also expected there to be issues with Unicode vs. Zawgyi vs. other encodings for Shan, because there are several different encodings for Shan, just like there are for Burmese. The articles are all in Unicode, great!

However, this also means, that at least in the near future, while Burma is still a "non-Unicode country", most Shan speakers with laptop and interest might not be able to write articles.

I can only hope that a Jinghpaw Wikipedia will someday be as well-progressing.

Best wishes from Zurich,

— André