I replied there.

I don't think that there should be a hard blocker for this. A language that is reasonably used outside of Wikimedia for publishing or education world is definitely eligible in my book.

Projects like the Tunisian Latin alphabet, which we discussed here a few months ago, is borderline, because it looks like a hobbyist project with little actual use, and I'd need something more substantial. But if, for example, a real school is involved, then I wouldn't block such things.


--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
‪“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬

2016-01-27 13:08 GMT+02:00 gfb hjjhjh <c933103@gmail.com>:
​​
The thing is that if someone want to initiate a new project but believed they does not met the written criteria, then they might simply opt to not proceed with their application at all. If there are no application then there are no round corner for langcom to blend.

2016-01-27 16:12 GMT+08:00 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>:
Hoi,
The language committee has always had the ability to do as it sees fit. All it takes is consent from all members. There is not much need to change the rules because there is an inherent ability to bend the rules.
Thanks,
      GerardM

On 27 January 2016 at 00:06, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg@googlemail.com> wrote:

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom



_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom



_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom