The main thing that is urgent is that the Montenegrin community is getting restless.
As to whether this should be approved (even waiting for an ISO 639-3 code), in principle I
agree with MF-Warburg. But in practice, it's a little hard for me to understand why
there shouldn't be a Montenegrin Wikipedia when there are separate Serbian, Croatian
and Bosnian Wikipedias. If I were a Montenegrin I would not be able to understand that at
all. If there were still only one Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia, I think we could make a case
for not creating any of the others. But from where we stand now, how can we possibly say
that separate Serbian, Croatian and Bosnian projects are acceptable, but a Montenegrin one
is not?
Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
________________________________
From: Steven White
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2017 5:43 PM
To: langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Montenegrin Wikipedia (URGENT)
I was going to hold off on this until the holidays are over, but rather remarkably, unless
somebody hacked the Library of Congress's web
site<https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_changes.php>hp>, Montenegrin has
been granted an ISO 639–2 code ("cnr"). This has been in the air over the last
month, and represents the first addition to ISO 639–2 in over five years. The Montenegrin
community is jumping for joy, and I've just full-protected the page Requests for new
languages/Wikipedia Montenegrin
5<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_M…
on Meta because the discussion is getting out of hand.
If srwiki, hrwiki and bswiki didn't exist, we wouldn't have to create this one,
either. But I have to admit that I don't really see any way we can currently justify
not approving this project (as "eligible"). My questions are, therefore:
* Am I right about that?
* Is LangCom willing to see this project marked as "eligible" based on an
ISO 639-2 code alone?
* The rules are that non-collective ISO 639-2 codes are supposed to be reflected in
ISO 639-3 as well. So do I wait until this code is published by SIL?
* If so, what happens if SIL does not take action?
Steven
Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>