Hoi, I have heard that there might be a given number of L2 speakers. As stated is not a convincing argument. I am willing to entertain the thought but it needs to be more convincing. Thanks, GerardM
On 6 February 2017 at 12:00, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
Gerard, do you object eligible status for this Wikipedia?
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, I am quite happy when someone argue their case. I will certainly listen.
In
the past there were Americans who said to support languages from Papua
New
Guinea. Their arguments is why we ask for native speakers. The good
thing of
this policy is that we can do differently when the situation fits a need. Thanks, GerardM
On 31 January 2017 at 17:46, gfb hjjhjh c933103@gmail.com wrote:
but as mentioned before, a language under revitalization effort mught
have
hundred of thousands L2 speakers with hundreds of them willing to work
on
the Wikipedia but it is still possible for none of them to be native.
2017年1月30日 17:13 於 "Milos Rancic" millosh@gmail.com 寫道：
On Jan 30, 2017 4:20 AM, "gfb hjjhjh" c933103@gmail.com wrote:
As discussed before, it would take a few decades before a language
under
revitalizing effort to gain a native speaker.
The context of "having native speakers" is not existential, but having them working on particular project.
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom