Gerard, we are talking here via the list langcom@lists.wikimedia.org. Am I missing something?

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com> wrote:

Hoi,

The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee. All its members are subscribed to that one.

Thanks,

    GerardM

On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic <millosh@gmail.com> wrote:

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg@googlemail.com> wrote:

I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements, it can be approved. Did anyone check it already?

No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked that inside of the first email.

On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval much quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for language preservation.

Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in your opinion?

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom