I've found some examples but I cannot say that it's "mostly
unacceptable"; there are at least as many articles which are very well
written and highly acceptable. Also, as Gerard wrote, monitoring WN:OR
is not one of our responsibilities nor within our guidelines or mandate.
So, I guess, that argument can be dropped.
On 30-May-17 10:40, MF-Warburg wrote:
If the content is mostly inacceptable ("copied
from other news outlets
(in violation of WN:OR)"), I am against the approval until that is